“Despite losing the series, Stokes' captaincy was better than Rohit's!”

Despite the humiliating series defeat by India, the former England cricketer believes that Ben Stokes is a better captain than Rohit Sharma.

Ben Stokes and Co were defeated by India 1-4 in the five-match Test series. However, former England spinner Graeme Swann has a different opinion about Rohit Sharma's captaincy.

Rohit faced criticism when he lost the opening Test due to his defensive captaincy, but he silenced the critics by winning the series with an experienced batting line-up.

Former England cricketer Graeme Swann does not believe that Rohit Sharma's captaincy was better than that of Stokes, the captain of the losing team.

“I don't think Rohit has been better as a captain because his bowlers have done well for him,” he said. I think Rohit had better weapons.

Swann said that it would be unfair to compare Rohit's captaincy with Stokes as the Indian bowlers did a great job to succeed their captain.

He said that Rohit has been good in the series, don't get me wrong about him, but I don't think Stokes has been a bad captain. The Indian skipper's bowlers helped him a lot.

Related Articles

Back to top button